Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Asia Muhammad vs Kimberly Birrell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Muhammad vs Birrell analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Asia Muhammad vs Kimberly Birrell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Muhammad 1 - 5 Birrell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Muhammad has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Birrell has won 42.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Muhammad, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Birrell has won 54.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Muhammad has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Birrell has saved 56.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Muhammad has won 72.73% of matches played (W/L 8/ 3), with Birrell winning 58.11% (W/L 43/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Muhammad has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 226/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 13/ 20). Birrell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 145/ 114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Muhammad has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 6/ 1), where as Birrell has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.44% of matches (W/L 29/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Muhammad winning 1 times and Birrell being victorious 5 times. They have played 15 sets in total, with Muhammad winning 4 and Birrell winning 11. The last match between Muhammad and Birrell was at the W100 Wiesbaden, 03-05-2023, First, Clay with Kimberly Birrell getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Muhammad and Birrell have played a deciding set 3 times, with Muhammad winning 1 times and Birrell 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Muhammad winning 0, and Birrell 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Muhammad has played against opponents with an average rank of 106 while Birrell has played against players with an average rank of 224.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Muhammad has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Birrell has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Muhammad has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Birrell has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
544
Rank
124
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total5
1
Hard4
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
132
Rank
100
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
54% (316-270)
Career Total W/L
54% (203-174)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (23-17)
$286,274
Career Prize Money
$487,328
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Asia Muhammad vs Kimberly Birrell For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Muhammad VS Birrell
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Asia Muhammad | Kimberly Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 5 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 11 |
| Games Won | 65 | 80 |
| Aces (Total) | 22 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:50 | 1:42:50 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (237/395) | 67% (272/408) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (150/237) | 64% (173/272) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (61/158) | 46% (62/136) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (19/42) | 41% (21/51) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (173/408) | 47% (184/395) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (1/6) | 83% (5/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 33% (3/1) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 67% (3/2) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Asia Muhammad
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Asia Muhammad
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| 7-6(1) 6-1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Asia Muhammad
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(2) 6-2 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Kimberly Birrell
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
116)
12
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 1-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Asia Muhammad
77%
(
72 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Asia Muhammad | Kimberly Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (23/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (55/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (487/438) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (12/4) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 190 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:55:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 233.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (1946/3000) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (1263/1946) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (453/1054) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (171/399) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (1428/3145) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (16/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (22/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 81% (21/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 19% (21/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 32% (19/6) |
Asia Muhammad Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Asia Muhammad
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
87 of
120)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Asia Muhammad
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Asia Muhammad
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Sohyun Park
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve %
61%
(
19 of
31)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Amarni Banks
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Anna Brogan
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimberly Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Kimberly Birrell
56%
(
77 of
138)
1st Serve %
69%
(
74 of
107)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
56 of
74)
46%
(
28 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
54 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Arianne Hartono
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Kimberly Birrell
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
17
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Harmony Tan
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Sonay Kartal
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-2 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
12
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
72%
(
79 of
109)
1st Serve %
82%
(
95 of
116)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
123
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Emily Appleton
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Destanee Aiava
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Muhammad Vs Birrell Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Muhammad are available here and Birrell photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
